California Senate bill seeks to prohibit homeless camps near schools
California Senate bill seeks to prohibit homeless camps near schools
Andrew J. CampaHomeless encampments located 500 feet from sensitive communities would be targeted for removal under a new bipartisan California Senate bill modeled
after onSan Diegos anti-camping law.
State Senate Minority Leader Brian Jones (R-Santee)
on Mondayintroduced Senate Bill No. 1011
on Feb. 5, which lists Democratic Sen. Catherine Blakespear of Encinitas as a principal co-author. There are also seven Republican senators and eight Assembly members along with two Democratic Senate supporters.
California has spent $22 billion in the past six years on homelessness and what do we have to show for it? Jones said at a news conference Tuesday. Nearly a 40% increase in the homeless population, encampments filling our open spaces and sidewalks with trash,
needlesdand human waste, children being exposed to open drug use and dangerous situations.
California has spent more than $22 billion over the last four years on combined housing and homelessness initiatives. That includes $10.7 billion allocated from the 2021-22 budget and $7.2 billion from 2022-23.
The Department of Housing and Urban Development released a report in December noting that there were 181,399 unhoused people in California. That number is more than 75,000 ahead of New York (103,200), the next closest state, and dwarfs No. 3 Florida (30,756).
Californias homeless population represents 28% of the entire unhoused community in the nation.
Jones legislation proposed to prohibit encampments within 500 feet of schools, open spaces and transit stops in order to protect vulnerable populations [such as] children, seniors, and families.
SB 1011 would also end sidewalk camping if a homeless shelter is available, which Jones said was vital to open
upwalkways for travel without unfairly inconveniencing homeless individuals.
The bill requires a 72-hour warning before an encampment sweep, giving homeless individuals a chance to find alternatives, according to Jones.
Enforcement officers will also be required to provide information to affected individuals in regards to sleeping
arraignments arrangements, and homeless and mental health services.
Public spaces are not living spaces, Blakespear said in a statement. People deserve to live inside, and the public deserve to use their parks, sidewalks and streets as they were designed. This bill is a step toward creating that reality.
Sen. Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh (R-Yucaipa) said in a statement that SB 1011 struck a balance between accountability and compassion.
By compassionately clearing encampments, we aim to ensure that families can go about their daily lives without having to worry about the dangers posed by homeless individuals with mental health issues, trash, and drug paraphernalia, she said.
The law was modeled after San Diegos Unsafe Camping Ordinance, which was passed in June.
Those regulations allow the removal of encampments within two blocks of schools, kindergarten through high school, and shelters, along with trolley tracks and transportation hubs, in city parks and waterways.
Los Angeles passed its own controversial encampment ban, dubbed 41.18 for the municipal code section, that riled
unhoused activists supporters of the unhoused. The ordinance banned tents from blocking sidewalks and camping within 500 feet of a school, day-care centers, public parks or libraries.
City Controller Kenneth Mejia was one of the ordinance's biggest detractors and has said the law creates additional trauma for those who live on the streets.
While Jones bill is in its infancy, its prospects will likely hinge on a U.S. Supreme Court ruling in a case that could determine whether cities can legally ban or restrict people sleeping on the streets or in other public places. In the city of Grants Pass vs. Gloria Johnson case, officials in the Oregon city adopted an ordinance that says: No person may sleep on public sidewalks, streets, or alleyways at any time as a matter of individual and public safety. A panel of the San Francisco-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit laterdeclared the ordinance unconstitutional
. Like Grants Pass, California cities have been the subject of federal lawsuits after passing similar restrictions. Gov. Gavin Newsom filed an in September in the Grants Pass case, joining other city, county and state leaders who are looking to limit impediments to removing encampments.The courts have tied the hands of state and local governments that seek to use common sense approaches to clean our streets and provide help for unhoused Californians living in inhumane conditions, Newsom wrote.
Categories
Recent Posts
